By Wen-Chen Hu
Lately, the emergence of instant and cellular networks has made attainable the admission of digital trade to a brand new program and examine topic: cellular trade, outlined because the alternate or trading of commodities, companies, or info on the net by using cellular hand-held units. in exactly many years, cellular trade has emerged from nowhere to develop into the most popular new pattern in company transactions. although, the prosperity and recognition of cellular trade might be dropped at the next point provided that info is securely and appropriately exchanged between finish platforms (mobile clients and content material providers). Advances in defense and check equipment for cellular trade contains high quality learn papers and commercial and perform articles within the parts of cellular trade protection and fee from teachers and industrialists. It covers study and improvement result of lasting value within the idea, layout, implementation, research, and alertness of cellular trade protection and fee.
Read or Download Advances in Security and Payment Methods for Mobile Commerce PDF
Similar comptia books
Any corporation utilizing . web will finally (if it hasn't already) reveal a part of its performance as a . web net provider, and securing those positive aspects becomes activity #1. thoroughly brand new for the newest model of visible Studio . web, professional net prone defense within the . internet Platform is a complete therapy on the way to safe internet companies at the .
Written via participants of IBM's software program staff and examine department, this consultant explains how numerous J2EE parts are tied into company protection and the way J2EE functions can make the most of classification loaders, access-control regulations, the Java cryptography structure, public key cryptography criteria, net mail extensions, the Java safe socket extension, and net providers know-how.
An skilled administrator might use this to ensure not anything has been forgotten, and a brand new administrator might do good to exploit this as a roadmap. — Tom Duff, Duffbert's Random Musings method directors understand the web is a adverse surroundings. they cannot inform whilst a hacker will try and achieve entry to the SQL server, yet they could guess that there'll be an try quickly.
This ebook presents a really infrequent reward within the box of data safeguard - brevity. It is going to the purpose. It explains many phrases, a few of which I had given up attempting to comprehend, in quite basic sentences. commonly, midway via a publication, i have already forgotten the start - no longer with this one.
Additional info for Advances in Security and Payment Methods for Mobile Commerce
We emphasize that the first three parameters — the feedback, the number of transactions, and the credibility of feedback source are important basic trust parameters that should be considered in computing a peer’s trustworthiness in any communities. We illustrate next how the basic parameters can be collected or determined and how the adaptive parameters can be set. The Basic Metric We first consider the basic form of the general metric as shown below by turning off the transaction context factor (TF(u,i)=1) and the community context factor (α = 1 and β = 0).
Unfortunately there is so far no mechanism that can completely prevent this type of attack. Developing mechanisms that are robust to collusion among participants is currently an active area for research. • Lack of portability of reputation between systems. This limits the effectiveness of reputation systems. For example, if a mobile user travels to a foreign network, he or she would become a newcomer in that network and lose all his/her reputation in his or her home network. Efforts are currently underway to construct a more universal framework in e-commerce research.
Using trust values of peers recursively as the weight for their feedback, they are able to filter out dishonest feedback and make correct trust computations. However, the error becomes 100% when k is greater than 50%, which indicates they completely make wrong evaluations by mistaking good peers as untrustworthy and malicious peers as trustworthy. This is particularly interesting because it shows that malicious peers are able to fool the system by overriding the honest feedback provided by good peers when they are the majority.